| Maintaining
open communication is one of the keys to creating a welcoming and healthy
department climate. A department chair should be honest and fair,
and provide concrete, constructive feedback. Sharing relevant information
and maintaining open communication help create a sense of trust. The more information people are given, the greater
the likelihood that they will perceive the environment as open and the chair
as someone they can trust. Moreover,
making decisions openly and encouraging feedback from faculty help to create
a sense of buy-in and ownership, which in turn leads to improved leadership
in a department.
Different
committees have access to different information. By rotating committee
membership and leadership, different people have the opportunity to gain
exposure to various elements of departmental operations. While it is not advisable to frequently change
responsibilities or assignments, it is important that all faculty have the opportunity to take on important positions.
New people bring new ideas and perspectives and reduce stagnation. Moreover, some faculty may feel excluded or
frustrated about not being given important roles.
Transparency
in operations should also be applied to the Promotion and Tenure (P&T)
and salary increase processes. A
common perception of the P&T process is that it is not always objective. To allay concerns about the process, departments
could develop and maintain objective criteria for granting tenure and
promotions and inform their faculty of these expectations. Although it is impossible to guarantee any element
of the faculty reward system, the process should be openly communicated
to prevent unnecessary anxiety. Chapters
24 and 25 of the Faculty
Code describe the P&T process.
This formal description should be supplemented with more informal
information-sharing opportunities. For example, this information can be
reinforced through promotion and tenure workshops such as the College
of Arts and Sciences Promotion
and Tenure workshops or at
annual review meetings (see Chapter 24, Section 24-57 C.). Although there may be no single scale against
which all cases are measured, it is still useful to share as much detail
as possible. (e.g. UW College of Arts and Sciences
Promotion
and Tenure Guideline.)
PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS:
The ADVANCE
CIC has hired two senior faculty members as professional
development consultants to help create transparency in the P&T
process. These consultants, one from the College
of Engineering and one from
the College of Arts & Sciences, are available for confidential discussions
on career paths with individual faculty members, particularly on how
to best prepare the curriculum vitae during the period before promotion.
Having previously served on their respective
colleges' Promotion and Tenure committees, they have a unique perspective
on the criteria for excellence that the College values. This program does not ensure promotion or career
advancement but can help dispel some myths about the P&T process.
(For additional information, please contact CIC Director Eve Riskin.)
ACCESS
TO EVALUATION PROCESS:
Just as
all faculty gain valuable information about what makes a good proposal
by serving on proposal review boards, pre-tenure faculty could also
benefit from serving on tenure portfolio preparation or annual review
evaluation committees. (See, for example, the University
of Michigan, Ann
Arbor, Principles
for Best Practices or the University
of California, Irvine,
Faculty
Recruitment Manual.) If committee membership is not feasible, the
faculty could be allowed to observe the process, perhaps outside their
department. As with proposal reviews, all committee discussion
would remain confidential. It is best if pre-tenure faculty have this
experience before their own portfolios are evaluated. By experiencing the process first-hand before
being reviewed, pre-tenure faculty can truly see how tenure portfolios
and/or annual review documents are evaluated. This kind of information
will help pre-tenure faculty better understand expectations and strategize
how to successfully present their work.
|
|
Last Updated: July 07, 2005
advance@engr.washington.edu
The College of
Engineering website is regularly updated. We strive to make it universally
accessible by conforming to the standards described by the DO-IT
program. If you experience any problems with any webpages in this
site, please contact the webmaster and/or read the known issues webpage.
|